Dear dnsmasq community,

The changelog for version 2.47 contains the following:

        Don't dynamically allocate DHCP addresses which may break
        Windows.  Addresses which end in .255 or .0 are broken in
        Windows even when using supernetting.
        --dhcp-range=192.168.0.1,192.168.1.254,255,255,254.0 means 
        192.168.0.255 is a valid IP address, but not for Windows. 
        See Microsoft KB281579. We therefore no longer allocate 
        these addresses to avoid hard-to-diagnose problems.

Unless I'm mistaken the listed Microsoft KB applies only to Windows versions 
that are long since past end of support. Furthermore, CIDR was introduced by 
the IETF more than 30 years ago.

I was therefore wondering whether it is time to retire the special treatment of 
addresses ending in .0 or .255 in Class C address ranges.

Many thanks, Jan
_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss

Reply via email to