On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 08:44:13PM +0200, Erik Karlsson wrote: > From: Erik Karlsson <erik.karls...@iopsys.eu> > > Not doing so can result in a use after free since the name for DHCP > derived DNS records is represented as a pointer into the DHCP lease > table. Update will only happen when necessary since lease_update_dns > tests internally on dns_dirty and the force argument is zero. > > Signed-off-by: Erik Karlsson <erik.karls...@iopsys.eu> > --- > src/dnsmasq.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/src/dnsmasq.c b/src/dnsmasq.c > index a9f26ae..1be3b82 100644 > --- a/src/dnsmasq.c > +++ b/src/dnsmasq.c > @@ -1518,6 +1518,7 @@ static void async_event(int pipe, time_t now) > { > lease_prune(NULL, now); > lease_update_file(now); > + lease_update_dns(0); > } > #ifdef HAVE_DHCP6 > else if (daemon->doing_ra) > -- > 2.43.2 >
Looks good to me. For preventing that the patch falls through the cracks, send the patch to email address '~stappers/dnsmasqm...@lists.sr.ht' to get it at https://lists.sr.ht/~stappers/dnsmasqmlpc/patches (mlpc: mailinglistpatchcollector) Groeten Geert Stappers -- Silence is hard to parse _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss