On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 10:22:13AM +0530, Jagadeesh M wrote: > Hi, > > Wanted your suggestion regarding a problem we are seeing with dnsmasq > configuration. > > At first, we had an issue where we did have dnsmasq sending RA's with > multiple prefixes as we had multiple ipv6 addresses(with different > prefixes) on the interface. > So, as per our requirement we made dnsmasq to send only one prefix (clients > should configure ipv6 address with only that prefix), we changed dhcp-range > config in dnsmasq. > > from > *a. dhcp-range=::,constructor:eth0,ra-stateless,24*h (with this config, > lifetimes are decrementing in clients properly) > > to > *b. dhcp-range=eth0,1234::,ra-stateless,24h* > > But,* after changing configuration to type 'b'*, we observed that whenever > the clients receive a new RA, the clients are updating lifetimes values > back to 86400 seconds(valid and preferred lifetime values which we gave) > I mean to say, always the valid and preferred lifetimes in RA(seen through > captures) is *constant at 86400*. It is not decrementing and it is becoming > a protocol violation. > > Overall, our aim is to send only 1 ipv6 prefix in RA, even though we have > multiple ipv6 addresses(with multiple prefixes) on the interface. > Also, another question: Is there any dhcp-range configuration with which we > can exclude sending ULA prefixes in RA ? > > I tried to configure dhcp-range with other alternative ways, but nothing is > working out. > > Any help/suggestions would be highly helpful and appreciated.
Suggestion: Try harder to explain the "problem". -- Silence is hard to parse _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
