On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 10:46 AM Simon Kelley <si...@thekelleys.org.uk> wrote: > > A quick test of the current development code fails to reproduce this, > which is puzzling. > > > One thing to check: having a dhcp-host line which associates an address > with a name is not enough to make this work: there needs to be an active > DHCP lease in place to be able to resolve client1.test.example.com. If > leases are coming and going, that can be enough to confuse tests. > > > Do you see the same effect if you use host-record to define the address > of client1?
Yes, host-record works. Here is what I did as a workaround to the cname issue: add "dhcp-host" record to do static IP reservation for "client1", and then add "host-record" for "alias" with "client1" IP. Now I can lookup alias.test.example.com and get the IP of client1, without the need of cname to client1. _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss