On 10/10/2021 10:42, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 03:20:33AM +0200, Trey Sis wrote:
On 10/10/2021 2:08, E wrote:
dnsmasq can't start when the user add filter-AAAA or --filter-AAAA to
conf file.
Hi,
you shouldn't really do that anyways. Removing AAAA records is usually a
very bad idea. It will also keep your network from being ready for the
future.
Very true.
But the message that started this thread should be read as
Hello people that I address,
You made dnsmasq.
I demanded a feature.
You added even two features `filter-A` and `filter-AAAA`.
I'm yet not capable of using the new feature.
You must help me.
I already told that two days ago.
You MUST help me NOW.
Regards Entitled
Cheers,
T
Groeten
Geert Stappers
Geert,
you're barking up the wrong tree. Neither did I report the problem that
dnsmasq wouldn't start up (it does start up for me and works as
intended, both filter-A and filter-AAAA, btw.), nor did I demand a feature.
On the contrary: I proposed a feature and provided a patch myself, only
that my patch wasn't conforming to the standards. Also, I don't see
where the original poster asked anything before regarding the feature.
Furthermore, if it were for me, I'd rather have no filter-A, than having
filter-AAAA included. But I guess this ship is sailed now. Why I don't
like the simple existence of filter-AAAA: it will just facilitate it for
too many people to completely disable IPv6 in their networks. That will
cause a bad long-term effect on IPv6 transition.
Cheers,
treysis
_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
