On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 05:37:25PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 03:34:59PM +0200, Trey Sis wrote: > > > > Cheers, > > Treysis > > > > Patch: > > > > >From bd22a36f76e35a0dc6c8be8996056318fec96e5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: treysis <trey...@gmx.net> > > Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2021 15:27:26 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH] Add option to filter A record requests > > > > --- > > src/dnsmasq.h | 3 ++- > > src/option.c | 3 +++ > > src/rfc1035.c | 11 +++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > That patch did not apply cleanly. With some manual work it did apply. > Except to see the reworked version here soon.
:-) It should have arrived ... > Hopefully is Author left intact. (I'm about to `git send-email` a patch > that is not mine ). I think https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2021q2/015109.html looks good. @Simon: Please check with `git show` after the `git am`. > And the original patch lacks update of the manual page, > it is where I chip in. That became https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2021q2/015110.html > > Is there any chance > > for such a patch to make it into official dnsmasq? Yes. And increase that chance by doing a follow-up on this message. Groeten Geert Stappers P.S. Going from one in a biljion to one in a million is a huge increase in chance. P.P.S. I think mixing gambling and software development is here off-topic 8^) -- Silence is hard to parse _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
