On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:05:05AM +0200, Alkis Georgopoulos wrote: > Hi all, ;-)
> I'm one of the LTSP developers; I asked Shrenik to contact the dnsmasq > mailing list because I feel this might be a dnsmasq issue. > > Specifically, success or failure depends on whether these five lines are > commented out or not: > > #pxe-service=tag:proxy,tag:!iPXE,X86PC,"undionly.kpxe",ltsp/undionly.kpxe > #pxe-service=tag:proxy,tag:!iPXE,X86-64_EFI,"snponly.efi",ltsp/snponly.efi > #pxe-service=tag:proxy,tag:iPXE,X86PC,"ltsp.ipxe",ltsp/ltsp.ipxe > #pxe-service=tag:proxy,tag:iPXE,X86-64_EFI,"ltsp.ipxe",ltsp/ltsp.ipxe > #pxe-service=tag:rpi,X86PC,"Raspberry Pi Boot ",unused > > You may find the full configuration files and logs at: > https://github.com/ltsp/ltsp/pull/417 > > The reason I feel it might be a dnsmasq issue, is that these tags are NOT > matched in Shrenik's use case. He's not using proxy mode and he's not > booting a Raspberry Pi. > > So, "pxe-service" lines that are NOT matched, cause the problem, > yet if they're commented out, the problem is gone... > > Would that be an issue with dnsmasq, or with the UEFI PXE stack? I go for something inbetween: UEFI PXE stack insisting on something that dnsmasq **configuration** doesn't yet provide. Or server side **configuration** is something that the client can't handle. Advice: Leave out `pxe-service`, skip "PXE". Yes, do iPXE ;-) [1] Transform | #pxe-service=tag:proxy,tag:!iPXE,X86PC,"undionly.kpxe",ltsp/undionly.kpxe | #pxe-service=tag:proxy,tag:!iPXE,X86-64_EFI,"snponly.efi",ltsp/snponly.efi | #pxe-service=tag:proxy,tag:iPXE,X86PC,"ltsp.ipxe",ltsp/ltsp.ipxe | #pxe-service=tag:proxy,tag:iPXE,X86-64_EFI,"ltsp.ipxe",ltsp/ltsp.ipxe | #pxe-service=tag:rpi,X86PC,"Raspberry Pi Boot ",unused into something like[2]: | tag:!iPXE,X86PC,ltsp/undionly.kpxe | tag:!iPXE,X86-64_EFI,ltsp/snponly.efi | tag:iPXE,X86PC,ltsp/ltsp.ipxe | tag:iPXE,X86-64_EFI,ltsp/ltsp.ipxe | tag:rpi,X86PC,unused Request: Report back Groeten Geert Stappers Voetnoten: [1] iPXE stands for "It doesn't do PXE" [2] actual syntax not verified -- Silence is hard to parse _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
