Op 04-03-13 00:29, Ed W schreef: > Dnsmasq by default queries all dnsservers simultaneously and locks onto the > one which gives the fastest response (rechecking every few queries or every > 60 seconds - or some numbers like that) > > So I guess it's just bad luck that the fastest resolver has a bad record?
Thanks for your response. In my tests the two main resolvers were both equally fast (≈ 1 ms as they had the results cached), so even though one may be a tiny bit quicker than the other, I doubt it would be an explanation for it choosing a specific server 19 out of 20 times. Though it would be interesting to verify this; is there some debug option that shows dnsmasq's train of thought? > Using strictorder should prove that this is the case? What do you mean here? Thanks, Sjors
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
