On Saturday 02 December 2006 21:56, Philip Wall wrote:
> Getting this during compile of a fresh
> dnsmasq 2.35
> Kernel 2.6.19 They changed a bunch of things in this kernel.
> Slamd64 11 (slackware 64bit version)
> gcc 3.4.6
> Previous versions had no problem building
$ time make -j5
make I18N=-DNO_GETTEXT -f ../bld/Makefile -C src dnsmasq
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/common/src/dnsmasq-2.35/src'
cc -O2 -DNO_GETTEXT `echo | ../bld/pkg-wrapper pkg-config --cflags dbus-1`
-Wall -W -c cache.c
cc -O2 -DNO_GETTEXT `echo | ../bld/pkg-wrapper pkg-config --cflags dbus-1`
-Wall -W -c rfc1035.c
cc -O2 -DNO_GETTEXT `echo | ../bld/pkg-wrapper pkg-config --cflags dbus-1`
-Wall -W -c util.c
cc -O2 -DNO_GETTEXT `echo | ../bld/pkg-wrapper pkg-config --cflags dbus-1`
-Wall -W -c option.c
cc -O2 -DNO_GETTEXT `echo | ../bld/pkg-wrapper pkg-config --cflags dbus-1`
-Wall -W -c forward.c
cc -O2 -DNO_GETTEXT `echo | ../bld/pkg-wrapper pkg-config --cflags dbus-1`
-Wall -W -c isc.c
cc -O2 -DNO_GETTEXT `echo | ../bld/pkg-wrapper pkg-config --cflags dbus-1`
-Wall -W -c network.c
cc -O2 -DNO_GETTEXT `echo | ../bld/pkg-wrapper pkg-config --cflags dbus-1`
-Wall -W -c dnsmasq.c
cc -O2 -DNO_GETTEXT `echo | ../bld/pkg-wrapper pkg-config --cflags dbus-1`
-Wall -W -c dhcp.c
cc -O2 -DNO_GETTEXT `echo | ../bld/pkg-wrapper pkg-config --cflags dbus-1`
-Wall -W -c lease.c
cc -O2 -DNO_GETTEXT `echo | ../bld/pkg-wrapper pkg-config --cflags dbus-1`
-Wall -W -c rfc2131.c
cc -O2 -DNO_GETTEXT `echo | ../bld/pkg-wrapper pkg-config --cflags dbus-1`
-Wall -W -c netlink.c
cc -O2 -DNO_GETTEXT `echo | ../bld/pkg-wrapper pkg-config --cflags dbus-1`
-Wall -W -c dbus.c
cc -O2 -DNO_GETTEXT `echo | ../bld/pkg-wrapper pkg-config --cflags dbus-1`
-Wall -W -c bpf.c
cc -O2 -DNO_GETTEXT `echo | ../bld/pkg-wrapper pkg-config --cflags dbus-1`
-Wall -W -c helper.c
cc -o dnsmasq cache.o rfc1035.o util.o option.o forward.o isc.o network.o
dnsmasq.o dhcp.o lease.o rfc2131.o netlink.o dbus.o bpf.o helper.o `echo |
../bld/pkg-wrapper pkg-config --libs dbus-1`
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/common/src/dnsmasq-2.35/src'
real 0m3.050s
user 0m4.116s
sys 0m0.476s
$ cat /etc/slackware-version ; gcc --version
Slackware 10.2.1 (x86_64)
gcc (GCC) 3.4.6
...
Perhaps you're missing some requisite library? But anyway, dnsmasq is
provided in both Slackware and Slamd64:
$ locate dnsmasq | grep '\.tgz$'
/home/common/slamd64-10.2b/slackware/n/dnsmasq-2.24-x86_64-1.tgz
/home/common/slamd64-11.0/slackware/n/dnsmasq-2.33-x86_64-1.tgz
/home/common/slackware-10.1/slackware/n/dnsmasq-2.20-i486-1.tgz
/home/common/slackware-10.2/slackware/n/dnsmasq-2.23-i486-1.tgz
/home/common/slackware-11.0/slackware/n/dnsmasq-2.33-i486-1.tgz
... so you could:
1. installpkg it
2. Edit and run Fred's dnsmasq.SlackBuild
> cc -O2 -DNO_GETTEXT `echo | ../bld/pkg-wrapper pkg-config --cflags
> dbus-1` -Wall -W -c netlink.c
> netlink.c: In function `iface_enumerate':
> netlink.c:159: warning: implicit declaration of function `IFA_RTA'
> netlink.c:159: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer
> without a cast
> netlink.c:160: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> netlink.c:162: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> netlink.c:166: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> netlink.c:172: error: `IFA_LOCAL' undeclared (first use in this
> function)
> netlink.c:172: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
> once netlink.c:172: error: for each function it appears in.)
> netlink.c:174: error: `IFA_BROADCAST' undeclared (first use in this
> function)
> netlink.c:181: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> netlink.c:185: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> netlink.c:190: error: `IFA_ADDRESS' undeclared (first use in this
> function)
> netlink.c:197: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> netlink.c:197: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> make[1]: *** [netlink.o] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/www/src/dnsmasq-2.35/src'
> make: *** [dnsmasq] Error 2
I'm running on a 2.6.18.2 kernel with /usr/src/linux pointing to
linux-2.6.15.5 sources. So yes, maybe the 2.6.19 kernel is your
problem. Although I have it on good authority that 2.6.19 is perfect,
and any problems with it are your own %*&^$*! fault. Linus said so. :)
--
Offlist mail to this address is discarded unless
"/dev/rob0" or "not-spam" is in Subject: header
