On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 6:35 AM Peter van Dijk <peter.van.d...@powerdns.com> 
wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-11-29 at 17:07 +0100, Ralf Weber wrote:
> > Moin!
> > 
> > On 29 Nov 2021, at 12:59, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> > 
> > > We propose to lower, in the first quarter of 2022, the TTL on NS records 
> > > to 86400 and on DS records to 3600.
> > I very much support that and would go even lower for for NS records. Maybe 
> > consider 21600 there.
> 
> Same. I support this, and I also support lowering NS even further, even
> to 3600.

Another Aye from me on DS & NS to TTL 3600.

I think this will definitely help in DNSSEC deployment as then a mistake is 
much easier corrected, which thus means more people might deploy DNSSEC.

For reverses there is low risk of course, till one realizes that most SMTP 
servers verify it hard, and missing reverse typically is considered 
misconfiguration. But especially for the SMTP case, an hour outage is doable, 
mail will be delayed but will be retried.

Greets,
 Jeroen


-- 

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your 
subscription options, please visit: 
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-wg

Reply via email to