> On 10 Nov 2021, at 16:58, Ulrich Wisser via dns-wg <dns-wg@ripe.net> wrote:
>
> Well, the general idea is that the resolver provides a reliable service that
> strictly follows GDPR.
I am not sure that I understand how a resolver can follow GDPR. WHOIS, RDAP –
ok, these services really may disclose some sensitive
information. How does a resolver can break GDPR?
> Current large open resolvers fall under the US Cloud Act with no privacy for
> non US citizens.
>
> DNS4EU is intended to provide DNS filtering of malware and pishing. But with
> the intention of actually having thread feeds that carry threads in languages
> other than English.
>
>
> /Ulrich
>
>> On 10 Nov 2021, at 11:28, Carsten Schiefner <ripe-wgs...@schiefner.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 08.11.2021 14:15, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 07:12:38AM +0200,
>>> Hank Nussbacher <h...@efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote
>>> a message of 34 lines which said:
>>>> Does anyone have further insight into the European initiative
>>>> known as DNS4EU?
>>> There is very little actual information published on this project.
>>> According to some rumors, it would be a public DNS resolver, with
>>> built-in censorship (for the laws of 27 countries).
>>
>> ... and mandatory to use, Stephane?
>>
>> If so, by whom?
>>
>> 500 million EU citizens?
>>
>> Or "merely" a subset thereof?
>>
>> If your rumors would and/or could tell, too, of course.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> -C.
>>
>
>
--
Taras Heichenko
ta...@academ.kiev.ua
