Ondřej Caletka <ondrej.cale...@cesnet.cz> wrote: > - opt-in basis
I would like to make this as light-weight as possible. There are already one or two levels of opt-in: uploading DS records to the RIPE database, and publishing CDS records (tho the latter is completely automatic with Knot DNS). > - no support for insecure to secure bootstrapping (RFC 8078) - if this > automatic management is opt-in, during opting in, the user should also > bootstrap the first DS That makes sense. > I personally pretty like the idea of special mntner, because it also > stresses the fact that actual object can be modified without of the > consent of the regular mntner. Yes, and it addresses Anand's comment that RIPE does not normally update users' objects. But I'm a bit worried that it might be too obscure. If it can't be eliminated entirely, perhaps it can be addressed by hints in the web user interface? Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Tyne, Dogger: West 5 or 6, increasing 6 to gale 8. Moderate or rough, becoming very rough in northeast Dogger. Fair. Good.
