On 05/05/2015 14:28, Jim Reid wrote: > Colleagues, here is what I hope could be a co-chair selection process > that the WG can adopt. It's been tweaked to take account of recent > feedback and should now be free of ambiguities.
in the case where two chairs are due to resign in the same year, the process for deciding who stands down is still ambiguous. When this was discussed in January, there was some consensus that this should be clarified. A couple of suggestions were made about how to deal with this. Nick
