On Nov 13, 2014, at 7:44 AM, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: >> I'd rather not see the RIPE NCC further endorse the DLV technology and >> service by continuing to submit key material there. > > thank you > >> DLV was meant as a temporary deployment aid and might have been a good >> idea at its time. > > or not > > randy >
+1 On Nov 13, 2014, at 8:05 AM, Doug Barton <do...@dougbarton.us> wrote: > The NCC should simply release ripe.int, as the historical reasons for > it no longer apply. (FWIW, same goes for apnic.int. None of the other > RIRs have similar domains.) +1 Regards, -drc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
