The following errata report has been rejected for RFC8467, "Padding Policies for Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS(0))".
-------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7874 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Editorial Reported by: hello world <hello.wo...@example.com> Date Reported: 2024-03-28 Rejected by: Eric Vyncke (IESG) Section: 6 Original Text ------------- Note that even with encryption and padding, it might be trivial to identify that the observed traffic is DNS. Corrected Text -------------- Note that even with encryption and padding, it might be easy to identify that the observed traffic is DNS. Notes ----- easy to understand what that means. --VERIFIER NOTES-- While the suggested text*might* be easier to read (and as a non-English speaker easy/trivial are easy to read even if they do not convey the same semantic), it is not worth a verified errata IMHO. -------------------------------------- RFC8467 (draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-06) -------------------------------------- Title : Padding Policies for Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS(0)) Publication Date : October 2018 Author(s) : A. Mayrhofer Category : EXPERIMENTAL Source : DNS PRIVate Exchange Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
