Erratum 7832 in RFC 9539 is correct and should be marked as Verified.  The
"damping" parameter should indeed be characterized by the specific
encrypted transport it is associated with.

A recursive resolver that implements both DoT and DoQ may perfer to use
different `damping` parameters for each encrypted transport, for
example due to concerns about different resource consumption patterns
for each implementation.

Thank you Kevin P. Fleming for the close read of this document.

      --dkg

On Thu 2024-02-29 06:53:40 -0800, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9539,
> "Unilateral Opportunistic Deployment of Encrypted Recursive-to-Authoritative 
> DNS".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7832
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Kevin P. Fleming <i...@kevin.km6g.us>
>
> Section: 4.6.3
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> *  E-status[X] is either fail or timeout and (T0 - E-completed[X]) >
>       damping, or
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> *  E-status[X] is either fail or timeout and (T0 - E-completed[X]) >
>       E-damping, or
>
> Notes
> -----
> The formula should reference the damping value for the protocol in use.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9539 (draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing-13)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Unilateral Opportunistic Deployment of Encrypted 
> Recursive-to-Authoritative DNS
> Publication Date    : February 2024
> Author(s)           : D. K. Gillmor, Ed., J. Salazar, Ed., P. Hoffman, Ed.
> Category            : EXPERIMENTAL
> Source              : DNS PRIVate Exchange
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to