On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 7:15 AM Ralf Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > > Moin! > > > On 31. Mar 2019, at 14:48, Watson Ladd <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > Please rip these ideas to shreds: > I assume with this sentence you mean that the following ideas are bad ideas. > Is this correct? If so why not say so, as there are a lot of people in here > including myself who are not native English speakers.
I meant I think they are good and they probably aren't so why? I don't know that much about DNS. > > > 1) An extra bit in a response for "you could have asked over TLS" > > 2) An extra field when looking up the nameserver for "you can ask > > that server over TLS" > > 3) An extra field/bit/convention for "this nameserver supports tls" > > (like tls-ns vs ns) > Can you please explain your opinion on these rather then stating that they > are bad (or good). > > So long > Ralf > > Sent from my iPhone > -- "Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains". --Rousseau. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
