> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mirja Kuehlewind [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 6:45 PM
> To: The IESG <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; Tim Wicinski <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls-13:
> (with COMMENT)
> 
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls-13: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
> paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Regarding the shepherd write-up: There is no requirement for an
> implementation section. There is a recommendation to have one, to track
> implementations efforts during the draft's live-time, but such a section is
> usually removed on publication as RFC as this information easily out-dates.
> There is another recommendation to have a section explaining the goals
> and/or next steps after the end of a (successful) experiment. I personally 
> don't
> think this is required here, given that I understand the experiment is to 
> figure
> out if this will be adopted (given there is stable reference).
> 
> One small question on the text in the draft:
> "For the client, state should be destroyed when
>    disconnecting from the network (e.g., associated IP interface is
>    brought down). "
> Does this mean all state including state used for session resumption?

No, if all state is removed then session resumption will not be possible. 
To avoid confusion, I will remove the above line.

-Tiru

> 

_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to