On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:15 AM, 🔓Dan Wing <[email protected]> wrote:
> During the DPRIVE meeting in Dallas, several questions came up about UDP > versus TCP. We had previously submitted a "DNS over DTLS" document which > predated DPRIVE. We re-submitted the document with a few edits and a > filename that makes it easier to find, > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-dprive-dnsodtls, diffs at > https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-wing-dnsop-dnsodtls-01&url2=draft-wing-dprive-dnsodtls-00 > > The working group may want to consider the advantages of DNS over DTLS > over UDP compared to using TCP: > > * No reliance on operating system support of TCP Fast Open [RFC7413] to > achieve same number of round trips. > * Avoidance of TCP's network head of line blocking. > > ​Just to confirm my understanding, with DTLS plus anycast, you'd have similar issues for restart as TCP (state being associated with a single endpoint, timeout required for flushing state). Is that your thinking as well?​ regards, Ted > -d > > > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy >
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
