Thank you everyone who participated. In my opinion there is consensus for publishing this document (after Stephane has folded in all comments[0]).
Many of the comments were about the contents without clear "I approve of this document" statements, but in my view the tone was positive. W [0]: I apologize, I have not checked the version in git to see if *all* comments have already been addressed. On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear DPRIVE WG, > > The authors of draft-ietf-dprive-problem-statement have indicated that > they believe that the document is ready, and have asked for Working > Group Last Call. > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-problem-statement/ > > This document was discussed at the DPRIVE meeting at IETF91 - some > notes here: > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dprive/minutes?item=minutes-91-dprive.html > > The document has also been worked on in GitHub, here: > https://github.com/bortzmeyer/my-IETF-work > It has also received a fair bit of on-list discussion. > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for > publication and send comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > Even if you previously expressed support for the document (e.g during > adoption), please respond to the WGLC showing that you still support > it. > > This WGLC ends Mon 09-Mar-2015. > > > In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 ("Promoting Compliance with > Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)"): > Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to > draft-ietf-dprive-problem-statement? If so, has this IPR been > disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, > 3669, and 5378 for more details.) > > Thanks, > Warren Kumari > (as DPRIVE WG co-chair) > > > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad > idea in the first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair > of pants. > ---maf -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
