> On 22/02/15 13:04, Hosnieh Rafiee wrote: > >> > A good summary. I've read these CGA-TSIG documents and I still do > >> > not understand the problem it solves, and how. A big explanation > >> > effort, > > starting > >> > from a problem statement, seems necessary. > > Secure authentication + data encryption > > > > Your suggestion to improve summary is welcomed as I am working on > revision. > > Hang on - didn't we set up a mailing list [1] for exactly that purpose? I.e. > to > investigate and explain Hosnieh's proposal. > AIUI that wasn't fruitful and the list was closed. > > I hope the dprive chairs will not allow repetition of all of that discussion > here. > That's nothing against Hosnieh or her proposal, but we should not divert this > wg with such repetition.
Hello? did you read the message at all or Do you have allergy with my name!! Don't be defensive I am not armed! :-) JFYI : CGA-tSIG is whole about DNS and nothing to do with secauth... secauth and now SDNauth [1] [2] is about SDN authentication and authorization especially the authorization of two controllers. This is nothing to do with DNS and DNS privacy. About closing an active group, other people have already also discussed in IETF discussion list and also secauth group. So I don't see a good reason to bring that discussion here to another group. [1] http://mail.rozanak.com/pipermail/sdnauth/ [2] https://mail.rozanak.com/mailman/listinfo/sdnauth > > [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secauth/current/maillist.html _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
