Did you try a flush? https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/cache
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024, 11:23 AM Robert Martin-Legene <rleg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Google's recursive DNS seems to dislike a registry operator removing DS > for some of their zones in parent zones, while still signing parent and > child properly. Even the now absence of DS is properly signed. > > The response is SERVFAIL even though the TTL has long since expired in all > caches. Also, there is no DS in their cache when queried about DS. > > All other known open recursive providers seem to adhere to the expected > behaviour. > > Is this a bug, Google? > > Feel free to contact me directly if you need specific zone names. > > -- > Robert Martin-Legene > _______________________________________________ > dns-operations mailing list > dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations >
_______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
