Peter DeVries via dns-operations writes:
>     Another relevant draft:
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8906
>
> Not sure how, it doesn't address _. as a use case at all and I only
> see testing for minimal EDNS not minimal qname.

The journey of that document was with, essentially, No Response
Considered Harmful. While it does go over many specific examples, the
thrust of it from the Introduction is that not responding to
legitimate queries is an ambiguous signal that burdens the DNS
ecosystem even more.
_______________________________________________
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations

Reply via email to