--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 9:47 PM John R Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:
> >> The incumbent is Verisign. Any reason to believe they are looking to
> >> replace them?
> >
> > It might just be the USG has to go through a procurement process for this
> > sort of thing every few years.
>
> Sure. Just wondering if there are reasons that the USG might be unhappy with
> VRSN.
>
> The RFP says they currently do not provide DNS service to registrants but
> want the new contractor to do so, to make the DNS more secure and
> reliable. I would imagine VRSN could do that.
It would have been easier before Verisign sold that whole business
line to Neustar, but sure. :-D
--
Matt Nordhoff
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
