On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 05:20:19PM -0400, John Levine wrote: > It appears that Robert L Mathews <[email protected]> said: > >The ANAME draft would have offered an immediate alternative to any DNS > >operator who wanted it, that worked 100% of the time, without needing > >any client updates. ... > > I am intrigued at the idea that browsers take a decade to update while > DNS servers update instantly.
Agreed. Everybody's used to regular browser updates now. I was the original author of the ANAME draft, and I thought it was a terrible idea, and said so at the time. The only reason I wrote it was that I believed browser vendors would remain unwilling to adopt a more sensible alternative, and as soon as my pessimism turned out to be unfounded, I was quite happy to drop the proposal. -- Evan Hunt -- [email protected] Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
