On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 11:09 AM Maarten Bosteels <maarten.li...@bosteels.eu> wrote:
> I fully agree with Steve that domain names have a peculiar value. Perhaps > the purchase price has become too low? > That feels like treating the wrong part of the problem chain. Loss of a phone number can also cause significant business disruption. Should we charge more for those as well? > If your domain is important to you, most registries offer a service to > protect your registration from all kinds of mistakes and attacks. > The name and exact details of this service differ from registry to > registry ... > This also feels like treating the wrong part of the problem chain. People who make car bumpers shouldn't design them to shatter like glass and then charge you ever-increasing prices to insure and replace them. (The reason why they do is left as an exercise for the reader.) Viktor's analogy to ACME is, by contrast, directly addressing the right parts of the problem chain. If domains are important, managing and renewing them should align with that importance. Royce
_______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations