Clearly anything can be misunderstood, and I've been around technology
long enough to know that technology choices are hardly rational all of the
time.
On Tue, 25 Aug 2020, Jim Reid wrote:
On 25 Aug 2020, at 03:30, Fred Morris <m3...@m3047.net> wrote:
I think the question has to be: why would someone be joining this chat channel
and who would they be?
[...]
There’s no justification for this outburst of shed-painting.
Know your customer. Really. This should be a basic tenet. I see mailing
lists mentioned on the OARC homepage; I don't see chat. It's members-only.
Ok, good, I learned something. Is it a selling point for OARC membership
(it's listed in member benefits)? If it is, then keeping its charter,
who's on it, and characterization of the kinds of conversations and
problem solving it fosters and enables a secret from prospective members
is a perfectly rational sales strategy (note the use of sarcasm).
Quite simply, we should trust Matt and his colleagues to make sensible
decisions [...]
I do. But while there are plenty of "perfectly good" airplanes flying
around there are probably zero without defects or flaws.
(This list is open to nonmembers. If the thread was intended for member
discussion only then sorry, didn't see the classification stamp.)
--
Fred Morris
_______________________________________________
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
