Kim Davies writes: > Nothing in this proposal prejudices changes to how the KSK for the > "arpa" zone may evolve in the future. I would suggest any effort > to define new baseline requirements for the "arpa" KSK be handled > separately as they are distinct from the objective of this draft. The > goal here is to delink the day-to-day administration of .ARPA from > the root zone such as that .ARPA would be treated like any other TLD, > allowing it to evolve in its own direction at its own pace.
I very much agree with this. That said, I would like to see that Phillip's proposal for evolving the key ceremony is pursued as well. _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
