> On 15 Dec 2014, at 02:45, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org > <mailto:d...@virtualized.org>> wrote: > > >> And 'a bit more challenging' is a significant understatement, especially at >> scale. > > Too bad no one has come up with something like Puppet, Chef, Ansible, etc., > to help manage infrastructure configuration at scale.
The IETF DNSOP WG tried. The requirements are in rfc6168. We wrote a draft describing an implementation - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dickinson-dnsop-nameserver-control-02 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dickinson-dnsop-nameserver-control-02> We even produced a proof-of-concept implementation of some parts of the draft (Big thanks to the NLnet Foundation for funding) - https://portal.sinodun.com/wiki/display/DNSCCM/DNSCCM+Home <https://portal.sinodun.com/wiki/display/DNSCCM/DNSCCM+Home> Unfortunately we were unable to generate much interest or get WG adoption for any attempt to document or develop a solution. Willing to restart work on this if there is interest and it has a chance of moving forward. regards John --- j...@sinodun.com <mailto:j...@sinodun.com> http://sinodun.com <http://sinodun.com/> Sinodun Internet Technologies Magdalen Centre The Oxford Science Park Oxford OX4 4GA U.K. _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
