Matt,

On Dec 14, 2014, at 6:08 PM, Matthew Ghali <mgh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Given the set of practical issues we’re worried about today, delivering a 
> service via multiple codebases certainly isn’t a magic bullet.

Agreed. I would be surprised if anyone seriously argues that it is.

> Upon closer inspection heterogeneity might reduce exposure to catastrophe 
> much less than you’d expect.

If you built out your customer resolver cloud with a set of Nominum servers and 
Unbound servers behind load balancers, would the resolver bug being discussed 
have taken out your infrastructure?

Do you believe managing the configuration of a set of Nominum servers and 
Unbound servers (regardless of how many) is in any way challenging?

Regards,
-drc

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs

Reply via email to