> On 27 Nov 2014, at 17:10, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> wrote: > > On Nov 26, 2014, at 10:40 PM, Patrik Fältström <p...@frobbit.se> wrote: >> FWIW, I have been working on this for a while with the Diplo foundation, and >> I am happy to answer questions (and of course listen to concerns). > > It is an interesting idea, but I don't get how it would work. I asked Jovan > back when he initially proposed it, but never heard back.
For me it is also "an interesting idea enough" to think about the experiment that: 1. We separate the problem of _production_ of the root zone from distribution and use of it 2. Parties (not only governments, but everyone) promise each other that we use the same root zone > Is the theory behind this that governments around the world would enter into > some sort of treaty or some other formally binding vehicle that would make > the root zone inviolable? What would be the sanctions should the holder of > the root zone (whoever it might be) ignore the inviolability of the root zone > and how would they be enforced? How is that going to work given (e.g.) the US > hasn't even been able to ratify the Treaty of the Sea and internal domestic > politics will generally override any international agreement at politicians' > whim? We do not have a protocol police, but just having parties promising each other to not touch the content would be a good start. Exactly how to implement, that is another question, and one that Diplo is thinking about. Patrik
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
