Having worked on solas at Intl maritime org, I agree with David. There are many parallels to that space and domain name space. We should learn from that experience.
Rick Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 27, 2014, at 11:19, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> wrote: > > Patrik, > >> On Nov 26, 2014, at 10:40 PM, Patrik Fältström <p...@frobbit.se> wrote: >> FWIW, I have been working on this for a while with the Diplo foundation, and >> I am happy to answer questions (and of course listen to concerns). > > It is an interesting idea, but I don't get how it would work. I asked Jovan > back when he initially proposed it, but never heard back. > > Is the theory behind this that governments around the world would enter into > some sort of treaty or some other formally binding vehicle that would make > the root zone inviolable? What would be the sanctions should the holder of > the root zone (whoever it might be) ignore the inviolability of the root zone > and how would they be enforced? How is that going to work given (e.g.) the US > hasn't even been able to ratify the Treaty of the Sea and internal domestic > politics will generally override any international agreement at politicians' > whim? > > Regards, > -drc > > _______________________________________________ > dns-operations mailing list > dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations > dns-jobs mailing list > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
