On Sep 15, 2014, at 10:00 AM, Wessels, Duane <dwess...@verisign.com> wrote:
> > On Sep 11, 2014, at 6:12 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote: > >> On Sep 11, 2014, at 4:27 PM, Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote: >> >>> for the time being, and perhaps for a long time to come, the >>> people who call the presence of .PROD a bug and/or depend on its absence >>> as a feature, outnumbers and will outnumber the people who call it a >>> feature or who will call its absence a bug. >> >> How do you measure that? This is a serious question, one that affects DNS >> operators. If you have a way of determining how many enterprises are >> negatively affected as a new gTLD rolls out, that would be very useful >> information. > > ICANN chose to not require logging for controlled interruption, so measuring > it like that will be difficult. However, enterprises can make their own > measurements. Both are true. > Over the weekend I updated dnstop[1] so that it will show queries for names > in the new gTLDs. An enterprise or other organization that depends on > not-fully-qualified names internally may want to run dnstop with this > filter to see if they are leaking queries and relying on NXDOMAIN responses. > e.g., > > $ sudo dnstop -f new-gtlds eth0 > > DW > > [1] http://dns.measurement-factory.com/tools/dnstop/ Excellent! Of course, the likelihood of any of them doing that is nearly zero, but it would be grand if they did. Maybe try to get this into the Verisign Twitstream. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
