On 2013-10-29, at 06:18, Jaap Akkerhuis <[email protected]> wrote:

> If I remember correctly, the whole mess was augmented by all these
> resolvers which thought that SE had a delegation only policy. When
> the name servers became in balliwick ...

The threat of delegation-only configuration in BIND9 was one of the things that 
caused me to propose the naming scheme you see for Afilias's hosted TLDs, back 
in the day.

Aside from the general ugliness and confusion that all those similar NS names 
cause (sorry about that) the general approach was to delegate the TLD to names 
in separate zones, but to host those zones alongside the TLD on the same 
nameserver. So, for example, we see

[walrus:~]% dig org. ns +short
a0.org.afilias-nst.info.
d0.org.afilias-nst.org.
b0.org.afilias-nst.org.
c0.org.afilias-nst.info.
a2.org.afilias-nst.info.
b2.org.afilias-nst.org.
[walrus:~]% dig org.afilias-nst.info. ns +short
b0.org.afilias-nst.org.
d0.org.afilias-nst.org.
a0.org.afilias-nst.info.
c0.org.afilias-nst.info.
a2.org.afilias-nst.info.
b2.org.afilias-nst.org.
[walrus:~]% dig org.afilias-nst.org ns +short
c0.org.afilias-nst.info.
b0.org.afilias-nst.org.
b2.org.afilias-nst.org.
a0.org.afilias-nst.info.
d0.org.afilias-nst.org.
a2.org.afilias-nst.info.
[walrus:~]% 

This allows any of those nameservers to answer authoritatively for any of those 
three zones, but provides defence against people asserting delegation-only 
semantics in ORG.

The use of separate superordinate TLDs for the nameservers themselves (ORG and 
INFO) was to avoid the question of whether there was a risk in naming them all 
under one TLD, since that question is difficult to answer convincingly; the 
risk profile when you consider all possible failure modes gets complicated to 
describe, quickly.

I haven't worked for Afilias for many years and certainly don't speak for them 
(or PIR) now, so consider this a historical nugget rather than anything 
authoritative about present-day operations or strategy :-)


Joe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
dns-operations mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs

Reply via email to