Em 22/10/2013, às 18:06:000, Michele Neylon - Blacknight escreveu: > > On 22 Oct 2013, at 20:28, Jared Mauch <ja...@puck.nether.net> > wrote: >>> >> >> It's difficult because there is not universal support amongst registrars. >> Once again the wheel gets stuck when the technical side meets the business >> side. > > It's not entirely "business" that causes the issues ..
.nl and .cz got massive registrar adoption to DNSSEC offering business incentives, so it seems business side accounts for most of it. > > Registry operators do not have a consistent or uniform way of implementing > DNSSEC, which makes integration more complex for registrars. Do you mean sec-DNS 1.0 (RFC 4310) x sec-DNS 1.1 (RFC 5910)? DS or DNSKEY ? Both ? My guess is that sec-DNS 1.1 with DS and DNSKEY would work for all DNSSEC-signed EPP TLDs... > > If, as a registrar, we only offered .com then it would be one thing, but > that's not the case .. Considering RFC 5910 is mandatory for all new gTLDs, and with that requirement being extended to gTLD renewals (.info, .biz, .org), it seems implementing RFC 5910 cuts it. Even ccTLDs like .br (and others for sure) follow RFC 5910. Rubens _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
