At 13:40 +0200 8/7/12, Faasen, Craig wrote:
Which is not compliant with RFC 1035: "RD Recursion Desired - this bit may be set in a query and is copied into the response."
While true, being a violation that is, I wouldn't worry about it. I.e., make the script loose here. It's like doing 60 in a 55 zone, on paper it's an infraction but it makes no material difference.
There are many places where the old RFCs either over or under specified actions. This is a case over over specification.
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis NeuStar You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468 2012...time to reuse those 1984 calendars! _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
