On 7/19/2012 4:55 PM, David Conrad wrote: > On Jul 19, 2012, at 7:25 AM, wbr...@e1b.org wrote: >> And in order to pass OT&E testing, NetSol's client application must pass >> muster. So they must be able to handle DNSSEC. Maybe I should give up >> tilting at this windmill and live with DLV for now. > IMHO, I think this sends the wrong message. One of the highest bandwidth > signals a for profit companies can receive is money walking away. Enough > money walks away and priorities will get shifted. Using DLV and staying with > NetSol merely reaffirms their de-prioritization of DNSSEC.
i agree. the better answer is to reward with your business those registrars who adopt the technologies you need. paul _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
