Hi,
Steve Litt writes:
> What could possibly be easier than vim /var/log/messages, or
> vi /var/log/messages, or emacs /var/log/messages, or
> nano /var/log/messages? And notice with the old way, you have a choice,
> rather than having to look at log output with the vendor's proprietary
> tool.
Maybe I'm peculiar but I always find it absolutely, totally jaw-dropping
when people use text *editors* to *look* at file content. Makes my toes
curl up and blood curdle.
Why on earth would you want to edit your system logs anyway?
On De{bi,vu}an derivatives, I'd use `pager`. On any other Unix-based
OS, I'd use `more` or `less`, preferably.
# On my own machines `lv` makes a fine `pager` for me. On the fly
# decompression and handling of many different encodings. So for me,
# it's just
#
# pager /var/log/syslog.2.gz
#
# without any `zmore` or `zcat` piping. There is still no zpager :-/
# but with `lv` I don't really need one.
Hope this helps,
--
Olaf Meeuwissen, LPIC-2 FSF Associate Member since 2004-01-27
GnuPG key: F84A2DD9/B3C0 2F47 EA19 64F4 9F13 F43E B8A4 A88A F84A 2DD9
Support Free Software https://my.fsf.org/donate
Join the Free Software Foundation https://my.fsf.org/join
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
