On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 17:02:17 -0400 Hendrik Boom <hend...@topoi.pooq.com> wrote:
> Wikis are often backed by revision management to make it asy for > administrators to bck out of spam. > To make sure they are backed up, use a distributed revivion management > system and make sure there are multiple repositories. The problem is that a huge amount of work ends up being foisted onto a sysadmin. Hosting aside, there are plugins for anti-spam, user management and all kinds of random things which shouldn't be left in the hands of random people. I still maintain that collaborative documentation is best done on a wiki maintained by a few dedicated people though. Also do note that it's possible to do wiki-like stuff using git wikis and flat files (likely markdown) at least on GitHub. I don't know if this sort of thing is reasonable with other systems. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
