On 7/28/21 2:02 PM, tito via Dng wrote: [ DELETED for brevity ]
That's bad... I love global variables ;-( as they avoid shuffling around parameters in functions (KISS?)
Global variables are a disaster looking for a place to happen, avoid at all cost. The scope of variables should be as small as possible.
OK, this is my private little hell but I am going to share. I dislike long parameter list when calling a method. You have to remember the order and the type. I prefer to pass in a struct / hash / class object / associated array / dictionary / {whatever}. it makes things cleaner. Depending on the language I prefer to pass the {whatever} in by reference instead of pass by value.
Another suggestion I have is to use the variable and method naming convention that java uses. I like the way it looks and I think camel case is more readable than snake case.
Josef -- Josef Grosch | Another day closer | jgro...@mooseriver.com | to Redwood Heaven | Berkeley, Ca. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
