On 07-03-2021 18:20, tito via Dng wrote: > On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 18:03:30 +0100 > Antony Stone <antony.st...@devuan.open.source.it> wrote: > >> On Sunday 07 March 2021 at 17:59:22, Steve Litt wrote: >> >>> See this web page: >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-pattern >>> >>> I'd say at least half of the listed anti-patterns are used by >>> systemd. >> Very nice. >> >> Antony. >> > Hi, > this makes me think of the times when you could startx > with IceWM on a 1.44 floppy disk. That was simplicity > and to a certain extent poetry. I personally would scrap: > dbus > consolekit > packagekit > policykit > systemd > apparmor > selinux > I am sure I've forgot some other garbage. > > P.S.: I'm open to new technologies...... > when they follow a simple rule: less code is better > as I can understand only as much code as fits > onto my screen. > > Ciao, > Tito
Hi, Mostly agree with you and in its current state apparmor belongs to this list. In the same time I like the idea of apparmor in limiting apps behavior. It could be most useful if implemented correctly. Grtz. Nick
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
