On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 03:53:11PM +0100, tito via Dng wrote: > Hi, > to be honest I have no opinion on it because I never looked at the code > (last time I touched something similar it was devfsd which I shrinked > in a ugly way for bb) and it would be a cold dive anyway. > Does mdev have all needed features to replace udev/eudev? > I'm for sticking as close as possible to debian (until they are > enlightened....centos' end should be a lesson to them) to reduce the > fallout of the changes and because the devuan manpower is limited. > Minor non invasive modifications like if2mac script give you back the > desired functionality without interfering with the internals.
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Mdev says: In general, when using KDE or GNOME, mdev is not suitable. but does not explain why. I surmise that KDE and GNOME have some specific involvement with udev. -- hendrik > > Ciao, > Tito > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
