On 1/31/19 7:50 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Simon Hobson - 31.01.19, 14:07: >> Massimo Coppola <massimo.copp...@isti.cnr.it> wrote: > […] >> It's clear that systemd isn't the right implementation. And it's clear >> that Poettering isn't the right person to be doing it. But I'd >> suggest that many of us "systemd - just say no" folks aren't >> fundamentally opposed to improvements where the improvement is >> actually better and not a bug ridden furball' > > Agreed. > > For me right now runit is closest to what I think would be good to have. > > Thanks, >
And containers are not a new idea, see, e.g., LXC and its kin. So there are in fact people working on alternate solutions in the same space as systemd, not with the same monolithic approach. And these alternate implementations are trying to be best of breed in their own space, while playing well with others. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
