On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 18:25:02 +0100 Alessandro Selli <alessandrose...@linux.com> wrote:
> On 21/11/18 at 18:15, m712 wrote: > >> Of course we are, why don't you read before replying? > > I can't be sure if you are in jest. > > > Of course I am not. > > Dr. Nikolaus Klepp asked: > > > From: "Dr. Nikolaus Klepp" <dr.kl...@gmx.at> > To: dng@lists.dyne.org > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 17:22:00 +0100 > Message-Id: <201811211722.00535.dr.kl...@gmx.at> > > > Why would anybody hardcode the link to sed in the first place? Isn't > that what $PATH is all about? > > > > And I answered with a case where the absolute placement of the sed > executable does matter and cannot be circumvented with a PATH setting > or the use of commands like which or command. > > > What is not clear? > > > You got the context wrong, or as we say here in the UK, you got the wrong end of the stick ;-) He asked 'Why would anybody hardcode the link', what has this to do with a shebang ? You are quite correct, you cannot replace a shebang with 'which', but then, this was never the problem. Did you read the debian bugreport ? Rowland _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
