Thanks both. Server and PC updated. Had only a minor issue that got fixed with this link: https://linuxiswonderful.wordpress.com/2018/05/01/x-broken-as-drmsetmas ter-failed/
Looks quite pretty, I have the impression that even the graphics cardworks faster) Regards, -- Andres Suarez Mobile +79310009732 On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 11:34 +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Adam Borowski - 10.11.18, 23:19: > > On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 07:41:19PM +0300, Andres Suarez wrote: > > > From the security point of view: Is it worth to update from > > > Jessie > > > to > > > ASCII? Do you see any significant advantage? I do no use any > > > exotic > > > software. > > > > Yes. Upstream (Debian) Jessie is only in LTS, which, as discussed > > in > > a recent flamewar, is quite a misleading term compared to general > > usage. It should be probably named "extended support" or such. > > > > Jessie is no longer owned by the regular security team, and sees > > nowhere as much attention as Stretch. Packages considered > > unimportant are silently neglected and may have unfixed bugs. CVEs > > are tracked in general, but you can forget about any reasonable > > coverage of non-security fixes. Or for backports in a good shape. > > > > Consider the LTS/ES a grace period to migrate to Stretch/ASCII > > rather > > than something recommended for use. > > On Debian machines I usually use both debian-security-support and > debsecan packages: > > debian-security-support has a command check-support-status, that > displays packages with limited support. It won't, as far as I guess, > not > show the limitations of LTS/ES support tough. > > debsecan send mails which CVEs are unfixed in current set of > packages. > > I did not test any of these on my Devuan server VMs so far. > > I usually combine this with both apt-listbugs and apt-listchanges > :). > And needrestart. > > Thanks, _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
