On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 15:14:48 +0200, KatolaZ wrote in message <20181022131448.c77g4mldzlcjv...@katolaz.homeunix.net>:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 02:54:40PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > [cut] > > > > sysvinit currently supports runlevels 0-6, with 0 and 6 have > > > special, fixed meaning. There is *currently* no way of naming a > > > runlevel using more than one character, due to the way the > > > "change runlevel" information is communicated to the init process. > > > > > > In Debian/Devuan, runlevel 1 has traditionally been assigned to > > > single-user mode, and runlevel 2 to multi-user mode. But there is > > > no written rule about that (meaning that a sysadmin can move and > > > configure runlevels around as she wishes). > > > > ..I thank you both for your excellent heads-up on the *current* > > status of sysvinit, a first step would be try utf-8 characters > > like 'telinit å ' etc ... :o) > > Aaand, I'm still not saying this is an awesomely good idea. ;o) > > > > Sorry, I should have been more precise on that: sysvinit currently > supports only runlevel names consisting of *one byte*. ;) ..well, that's still 256 possible runlevel names. ;o) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
