Le 15/10/2018 à 20:12, Rick Moen a écrit :
   We noticed, if the network
became saturated, the stacks became unusable in this order:
1.  AppleTalk (Apple)
2.  NetBEUI (Microsoft)
3.  IPX/SPX (Novell Netware)

The fourth stack, TCP/IP, was never observed to become unusable (though
of course a severe enough problem_could_  take it down).

The difference owed mostly to good vs. bad design, but in no small part
to how 'chatty' they were -- how some plastered the network with
excessive announcement and acknowledgement blasts, and others did not.

The DNS-SD ('dnssd') / mDNS stack_absolutely_, in that regard, reminds
me of AppleTalk.

Kill it with fire.  ;->

    It's true that these networks which work by broadcast consume a lot of the bandwidth. They aren't designed for large LANs. But service discovery is something very handy. I imagine it might be centralized into a local DNS server, with maybe some extension of the protocol, instead of letting every host talk to every host. I don't want to waste time figuring out printer properties and maintaining a printer list on my laptop. There are already too many reasons to waste time.
    Didier


_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to