On 26-07-18 18:21, Steve Litt wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 16:13:41 +0200 > info at smallinnovations dot nl <i...@smallinnovations.nl> wrote: > >> No it would not, it will offer developers who want to use some systemd >> API call in their development the opportunity to do so for nosystemd >> systems too. > Eeeeeuuuuuuuuu! > > What makes you different from the devs at Gnome? If it weren't for devs > taking advantage of this "opportunity", systemd would not have a > hegemony today. > > If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. > > SteveT > > Steve Litt > Author: The Key to Everyday Excellence > http://www.troubleshooters.com/key > Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/stevelitt
You did read this part too? > It would help maintaining packages that depend on systemd too. You only > would have to add some code to use the libnosystemd instead of > libsystemd0. Like if no systemd installed then use libnosystemd. > Depending of which API calls are used in the program and which are > supported by libnosystemd you would have to do less. And you are not > depending on a monolithic binary blob like systemd because you can > script any API call the way you like it. Do not forget that developers make and maintain almost all the software in use on your system. If you can make their life and your own easier what is wrong with that? Grtz Nick _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
