Quoting Alessandro Selli (alessandrose...@linux.com): > Adam Borowski's point is that if you have a single person > administering the distro's infrastructure it does not matter if the > infrastructure is an autonomous one or if it's hosted on GitHub:
So, Don't Do That, Then. {headdesk} I really don't think it's that difficult to understand that avoiding outsourcing in no way precludes appropriate fallbacks and measures to eliminate SPoFs. I'm frankly quite puzzled that my mentioning (as an example) GitLab elicited the comment 'This wouldn't have helped [because] you need redundancy' -- when I nowhere suggested eschewing redundancy and when that open source project has a mountain of documentation on that very subject. And I'm puzzled a second time to see you ignore my having just pointed that out, as if I hadn't. And redundant infrastructure (obviously) facilitates redundant administration and oversight. Why is this difficult? I don't think it is. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng