On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:57:13 -0400 Steve Litt <sl...@troubleshooters.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 09:08:14 +0100 > Florian Zieboll <f.zieb...@web.de> wrote: > > > Not sure if I am missing something here, but what can go wrong when > > it supports a PostScript version >1? > > You might pay $1000 instead of $400, or $2000 instead of $1000. I think that you don't pay this extra for PostScript itself, but mostly for a higher quality (weight...) product, which then fortunately includes support for a "reasonable" (debuggable, lol) file format. > Also, I *thought* all modern printers could understand and render PDF. > Was I wrong about that? I have a vague recollection, that there are printers and imagesetters, that are able to render PDF directly (never was involved in such a workflow myself) - but this is probably only true for equipment which does PostScript, of which PDF is a direct successor. libre Grüße, Florian
pgp82t_gtmfa0.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng